Seven strategies with evidence behind them, and why the first year after release decides most of it.
Recidivism reduction means lowering the rate at which people released from prison are rearrested or returned to custody. The evidence on what works is more consistent than the public debate suggests — and it points overwhelmingly at the first year after release.
Bureau of Justice Statistics data tracking people released from state prisons found the annual arrest rate fell from 43% in year one to 22% by year ten (Bureau of Justice Statistics). Risk is front-loaded. Any serious recidivism reduction strategy concentrates resources in the months immediately after release, which is precisely where most systems invest least.
The strongest evidence base of any intervention. RAND Corporation research found correctional education participants were 43% less likely to reoffend and 13% more likely to be employed, with an estimated return of $5 per $1 spent (RAND). See prison education programs.
Income is what carries someone through the high-risk window. The Federal Bonding Program and Work Opportunity Tax Credit exist to reduce employer hesitancy, and awareness of both is low. See jobs after prison.
Without an address, employment and supervision compliance both become significantly harder. Housing is the quietest failure point in reentry. See housing after prison.
Treatment that stops at the gate largely wastes the investment made inside. Continuity of medication and prescriber across release is the decisive factor. See substance abuse treatment in prison.
Untreated illness destabilises release and can lead to supervision breaches recorded as violations. See mental health in prison.
Family is the most common source of housing and support at release, and maintained contact during incarceration is consistently associated with better outcomes. See family support during incarceration.
Guidance from someone who has been through the same process addresses isolation and decision-making in a way services cannot. See reentry mentorship.
People who volunteer for programmes may differ systematically from those who do not, which complicates causal claims about any single intervention. The consistency of direction across studies is a stronger argument than any individual percentage.
Lowering the rate at which people released from prison are rearrested, reconvicted or returned to custody, through interventions such as education, employment support, stable housing, treatment and mentorship.
Correctional education has the strongest evidence base, associated with a 43% reduction in reoffending according to RAND Corporation research. Employment and stable housing immediately after release are the other consistently supported factors.
In the first year after release. BJS data shows the annual arrest rate falling from 43% in year one to 22% by year ten, which is why front-loading support matters.
For rates and definitions, see recidivism explained. Part of our complete guide to prison reform.
Get updates, stories, and opportunities to support the movement.